Trump wants Gaza

Wrest = forcibly pull (something) from a person’s grasp: He has raised the possibility of the country taking back the Panama Canal, proposed the U.S. wrest Greenland from Denmark and repeatedly suggested that Canada should be absorbed as the 51st U.S.  Ähnlich:wrench snatch seize grab force prise peel pluck tear rip heave twist tug pull jerk dislodge pry yank (take by force)

Trump’s new expansionist target: Gaza

WASHINGTON, Feb 5 (Reuters) – President Donald Trump’s jaw-dropping statement that he would like the U.S. to take control of and redevelop the Gaza Strip might have sounded like it came from nowhere, but it was in keeping with his new administration’s expansionist ambitions.
Since Trump’s return to the White House a little more than two weeks ago, his “America First” approach seems to have morphed into “America More,” with the president fixated on acquiring new territory even after campaigning on pledges to keep the nation out of foreign entanglements and “forever wars.”
Trump raised the possibility of the U.S. owning Gaza during a Tuesday press conference at the White House with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. He said he envisioned building a resort where international communities could live in harmony.
The casual proposal sent diplomatic shockwaves across the Middle East and around the globe, but was characteristic of how Trump has approached his second term – treating ties with close allies such as Canada and Mexico as largely transactional relationships and viewing the world as one large business opportunity. That view was underlined by his proposal on Monday to launch a U.S. sovereign wealth fund.
He has raised the possibility of the country taking back the Panama Canal, proposed the U.S. wrest Greenland from Denmark and repeatedly suggested that Canada should be absorbed as the 51st U.S. state. Reuters/Ipsos polling shows little public support for these ideas, even in Trump’s Republican Party.
At the same time, he has threatened Canada – along with Mexico – with economic penalties if they don’t accede to Trump’s border-security demands.
Trump also raised the prospect of a resettlement of the more than 2 million Palestinians living in Gaza, suggesting it had become uninhabitable after nearly 16 months of war between Israel and Hamas. Human rights advocates deplore such ideas as ethnic cleansing. Any forced displacement would likely violate international law.
At Tuesday’s press conference with Netanyahu, Trump spoke like the real estate developer he once was while acknowledging the hardships the Palestinian residents of Gaza have had to endure.
“You’ll make that into an international, unbelievable place. I think the potential and the Gaza Strip is unbelievable,” Trump said. “And I think the entire world, representatives from all over the world, will be there, and they’ll live there. Palestinians also, Palestinians will live there. Many people will live there.”
Trump’s son-in-law and former aide, Jared Kushner, last year described Gaza as “valuable” waterfront property.
Netanyahu praised Trump for “thinking outside the box,” but neither leader addressed the legality of what Trump was proposing.
But Trump may not be serious about a U.S. stake in Gaza, said Will Wechsler, senior director of Middle East programs at the Atlantic Council. He may be doing what he often does, taking extreme positions as a bargaining strategy, Wechsler said.
“President Trump is following his regular playbook: shift the goalposts to increase his leverage in anticipation of a negotiation to come,” Wechsler said. “In this case it’s a negotiation about the future of the Palestinian Authority.”
U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a joint press conference with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the East Room at the White House in Washington, U.S., February 4, 2025. REUTERS/Leah Millis Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab

HARD TO SEE A ‘HAPPY ENDING’

But Trump’s suggestion would seem to dismiss the idea of a two-state solution in favor of some sort of new paradigm that involves the U.S. perhaps serving as a buffer in the region.
“Wow,” said Jon Alterman, a former State Department official who now heads the Middle East program at the Washington Center for Strategic and International Studies. Gazans were unlikely to voluntarily leave the region, he said.
“Many Gazans descended from Palestinians who fled parts of present-day Israel and have never been able to return to their previous homes. I’m skeptical many would be willing to leave even a shattered Gaza,” he said. “It’s hard to me to imagine a happy ending for a massive redevelopment of a depopulated Gaza.”
Palestinian militants Hamas came to power in Gaza in 2007 after Israeli soldiers and settlers withdrew in 2005, but the enclave is still deemed Israeli-occupied territory by the United Nations. Israel and Egypt control access to Gaza.
The United Nations and the United States have long endorsed a vision of two states living side by side within secure and recognized borders. Palestinians want a state in the West Bank, East Jerusalem and Gaza Strip, all territories captured by Israel in the 1967 war with neighboring Arab states.
Dozens of protesters gathered near the White House on Tuesday to protest Netanyahu’s visit, with the demonstrations continuing after Trump’s remarks on Gaza were relayed to the crowd. Netanyahu steadfastly opposes a Palestinian state.
“Trump, Bibi belong in jail, Palestine is not for sale,” the demonstrators chanted.
As a presidential candidate, Trump largely spoke in isolationist terms about the need to end foreign wars and strengthen borders. He suggested Europe largely take on the cause of Ukraine in its war with Russia rather than the United States.
His early efforts in the White House have largely been focused on deporting migrants in the country illegally and shrinking the size of the federal government – two tenets of his campaign agenda.
Expansionism was not part of his rhetoric and there may be some political risk for Trump and his Republican allies. According to Reuters/Ipsos polling, voters are not on board.
Just 16% of U.S. adults supported the idea of the U.S. pressuring Denmark to sell Greenland in a Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted on Jan. 20-21 following Trump’s inauguration. Some 29% supported the idea of retaking control of the Panama Canal.
Just 21% agreed with the idea that the U.S. has the right to expand its territory in the Western Hemisphere and just 9% of respondents, including 15% of Republicans, said the U.S. should use military force to secure new territories.

Il piano di Trump per Gaza «Riviera»: choc, indignazione e sospetti di bluff | Israele si ritira dal consiglio Onu per i diritti umani

WASHINGTON

 – C’è stato un sussulto nella East Room della Casa Bianca tra i 150 giornalisti di ogni Paese del mondo quando

Donald Trump ha pronunciato le parole «take over»

e «long-term ownership position» proponendo che gli Stati Uniti

prendano il controllo e il possesso a lungo termine della Striscia di Gaza

per ricostruirla e trasformarla nella «Riviera del Medio Oriente». «Ci vivrà la gente del mondo, penso che si possa trasformare in un posto internazionale, un posto incredibile». Un annuncio epico, storico, scioccante, inaspettato che non era parte del discorso iniziale, ma è emerso attraverso le sue risposte ai giornalisti. Al fianco del presidente americano,

il premier israeliano aveva un sorriso di compiacimento stampato sul volto.

«Vedi cose che gli altri rifiutano di vedere», ha detto a Trump, aggiungendo che questa proposta potrebbe «cambiare la Storia».

Subito tutti si sono chiesti se si tratti di un vero piano. Trump ha dichiarato che l’unica ragione per cui i palestinesi vogliono stare a Gaza è che «non hanno scelta» e, se si costruiscono alloggi e belle città per loro altrove, si è detto convinto che non vorranno tornare più, sollevando lo spettro di un trasferimento permanente di due milioni di persone; poi in conferenza stampa ha dichiarato che tra la gente che potrebbe vivere nella nuova Gaza ci saranno i palestinesi.

Deputati e senatori del partito democratico hanno dichiarato: «Folle», «Sono senza parole». Le organizzazioni per i diritti umani hanno parlato di un tentativo di «pulizia etnica» e di rimozione forzata dei palestinesi in violazione del diritto internazionale. Deputati repubblicani come Nancy Mace esultavano: «Trasformiamo Gaza in Mar-a-Lago», ma altri come il senatore dello stesso Stato Lindsay Graham definivano il piano «problematico» e il fatto che Trump non abbia escluso l’invio di militari americani a Gaza come qualcosa che non piacerà agli elettori; il Wall Street Journal osservava: «È più espansionismo che isolazionismo».

Subito si sono diffuse due interpretazioni: la prima è che sia un bluff, come i dazi contro il Messico e il Canada, controversi quanto effimeri. Un modo per dire ai Paesi arabi: «Posso rendere le cose molto peggiori per voi, se non mi venite incontro». E forse un modo per incoraggiare gli alleati di estrema destra di Netanyahu ad andare avanti con il cessate il fuoco. L’altra interpretazione è che ci sia qualcosa di serio dietro la proposta, perché unisce due ossessioni di Trump — l’ambizione di realizzare la pace in Medio Oriente e l’istinto immobiliarista — e da mesi pare che ne parli con il genero Jared Kushner e l’inviato per il Medio Oriente Steve Witkoff.

Le parole della portavoce della Casa Bianca Karoline Leavitt ieri vanno nettamente nella direzione della prima interpretazione (senza escludere aspetti della seconda): il presidente «non si è ancora impegnato per l’invio di truppe nella regione» e «il fatto di non escludere nulla è una leva negoziale»; Leavitt ha specificato che non verranno usati fondi americani per Gaza; ha concluso che Trump «arriverà ad un accordo con i Paesi arabi» dai quali si aspetta che «facciano di più e ospitino temporaneamente i rifugiati» mentre Gaza viene ricostruita (la stima è di 10-15 anni) «per i palestinesi e per tutte le persone che amano la pace». Anche il segretario di Stato Marco Rubio ha suggerito che il trasferimento dei palestinesi sarà temporaneo, «durante la ricostruzione».

Riad ha «respinto in modo inequivocabile» il piano. L’Egitto ha specificato che gli aiuti devono avvenire mentre i palestinesi restano a Gaza. Il re Abdallah di Giordania e il presidente egiziano Al-Sisi verranno alla Casa Bianca nelle prossime settimane. Meno notata tra le polemiche, c’è stata un’apertura di Trump per l’Iran: ha detto che vuole l’accordo sul nucleare e gli ayatollah aspettano ora un suo messaggio diretto.

  • Dr. Raja SHAHED

    Doctorate Degree in Defense and Security Science (PhD)

    Related Posts

    Geopolitics of Today 10 July 2025

    oday’s briefing: — The geopolitics of Amazon — Work for the world’s happiest embassy — We bring good news! Sponsored by: Good morning Intriguer. Readers, I beg your indulgence —…

    Prepotenza americana madre di ogni guerra: dalla Seconda Guerra Mondiale 30 Paesi aggrediti

    Prepotenza americana madre di ogni guerra: dalla Seconda Guerra Mondiale 30 Paesi aggrediti Storia di Mario Capanna 29 giugno 2025 Bisogna spegnere la prepotenza più che un incendio. (Eraclito) Mark Rutte, l’ineffabile…